CSSRI |
Regional Centre Karnal is the only Regional Centre of internationally famous Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) and the Centre was established in 1932 to provide support for SBI Coimbatore to evaluate the clones under sub-tropical conditions.
| Year of Establishment | 1932 |
| Location |
NCR,
135km North of Delhi
Agarsen Marg, Karnal 132001 |
| Latitude | 29.1-29.5o N |
| Longitude | 76.3-77.1oE |
| Elevation | 243m
Above M.S.L. |
| Temperature
- Maximum Minimum |
38.7
– 40oc in summer |
| Rainfall | 744mm
(Annual) |
| Farm Area | 20.0
Ha |
| Soil Type |
Silty loam to
loam, deep, well drained |
| Source of Irrigation | 4
Borewells |
| Staff
strength: Technical Administrative Supporting |
5 6 1 14 |
| Institutional Projects | 6 |
| Revolving Fund Scheme | 1 |
| NATP Scheme | 1 |
The
present mandates is to
· To produce breeder seed of some elite sugarcane varieties for supplying to sugar mills/farmers.
Keeping
in view the mandates of the Centre, the following researches are being conducted
on various aspects of sugarcane
Project: Breeding elite clones suitable for North Western Zone
a) Hybridization, progeny evaluation and
selection:
b) Pre-Zonal Varietal Trial
c) Zonal Varietal Trial
Project : Evaluation of sugarcane germplasm under sub-tropical conditions
a) Evaluation of species clones:
b) Evaluation of interspecific and intergeneric
hybrid clones
Project : AICRP on Sugarcane Pathology
a)
Identification of pathotypes / races of red rot pathogen
b)
Survey of sugarcane diseases naturally occuring in the area
on important sugarcane
varieties
c) Assessment –
Cum- demonstration of IDM module against
major diseases of the area
d) Evaluation
of IET / Zonal varieties for resistance to red rot
e)
Assessment of elite ISH clones for resistance to red rot
Project : Studies on physiological parameters associated with sugar accumulation under subtropical conditions
Project : Agronomic requirements of promising sugarcane varieties
Project : Efficacy of biofertilizers on plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane under sub tropical conditions
Project:
Breeder’s
seed production of sugarcane clones
Project:
Isolation of genetic stocks for low temperature tolerance in sugarcane
with a view to improve the
ratoonability during winter months in North Western Zone
| Name | Specilization | Phone No. | |
| Dr. B.K. Sahi, Principal Scientist & Head | Sugarcane Breeding | 2268096
(O) EPBX2265567 –Extn 20 (O) 2265923 (R) |
bksahi.@Yahoo.co.In. |
| Dr. Arvind Misra, Principal Scientist | Sugarcane Agronomy | Extn
23 (O) 2268847 (R) |
|
| Dr. Narendera Singh, Principal Scientist | Sugarcane Pathology | Extn
27 (O) 2230630 (R) |
|
| Dr. S. Kumar, Principal Scientist | Sugarcane Physiology | Extn 22
(O) 2232618 (R) |
sksbirc@rediffmail.com |
| Dr. Bakshi Ram, Senior Scientist | Sugarcane Breeding | Extn
21 (O) 2267922 (R) |
bryadav2003@yahoo.com |
Sugarcane Breeding
Institute, Research Centre Kannur maintains the wealth of genetic material in
the form of germplasm clones (3340). Out of these 1860 clones were evaluated at
Karnal Centre.
|
Germplasm |
No.
of clones |
Name
of elite clones |
|
|
Evaluated |
Selected |
||
Evaluation of species clones |
|||
| S. officinarum |
307 |
13 |
Gungera,
Koelz 11132, Saipan G, Sarawak unknown, 57NG106, 57NG126, NG77‑26, |
|
S.
barberi/sinense |
62 |
14 |
Khakai, Hollukabbu, Pansahi, Chin, Pararia Shaj.,
Dhaur, Manga, Nargori, Rekhra, Saretha,White
Pararia, Kalkya , Khadya,
Kheli |
|
S.
robustum |
36 |
2 |
NG77‑221,
NG77‑58 |
|
S.spontaneum |
15 |
3 |
SES-222, SES-275, SES-352
|
|
Erianthus |
14 |
Insignificant differences for most of the characters |
|
|
Intra-species
improvement |
|||
|
Improved |
16 |
3 |
PIO88-100,
PIO88-101, PIO88-1809 |
|
Improved |
56 |
18 |
SIP-93-36,
-130, -250, -260, -306, -328, -373, -397, -419, -434, -472, -482, -484,
-540, -543, -559, -562, -569 |
|
Inter-specific
improvement |
|||
|
ISH |
347 |
68 |
ISH-001,
-002, -005, -009, -011, -020, -023,
-028, -031, -034, -035, -041, -043, -045, -049, -057, -060, -066,
-068, -069, -106, -110, -112, -115, -125, -127, -131, -137, -138, -153,
-159, -165, -184, -186, -188, -190, -193, -203, -228, -229, -246, -260,
-261, -264, -267, -269, -270, -282, -289, -295, -297, -301, -306, -308,
-309, -313, -314, -345, -354, -360, -362, -370, -375,
-385, -391, -409, -427, -428 |
|
CD |
87 |
7 |
CD-062,
-067, 098, -132, -277, -288, -374 |
|
Inter-generic
improvement |
|||
|
IGH |
20 |
5 |
IGH-441,
-447, -448, -451, -454 |
|
Low
temperature tolerant clones |
IGH-442,
-446, -447, -449, -451 |
||
|
Indian
Hybrids |
900
93 |
B
41-248, Co 513, Co 527, Co 537, Co 542, Co 649, Co 739, Co 866, Co 875,
Co 880, Co 886, Co 894, Co 907, Co 943, Co 954, Co 970, Co 996, Co
997-M, Co 1006, Co 1008, Co 1016, Co 1021, Co 1026, Co 1029, Co 1054, Co
1069, Co 1075, Co 1084, Co 1091, Co 1125, Co 1182, Co 1251, Co 1267, Co
1341, Co 62240, Co 62243, Co 62260, Co 62263, Co 62268, Co 62270, Co
62299, Co 62304, Co 62307, Co 62324, Co 62347, Co 6334, Co 6424, Co
6502, Co 6511, Co 6514, Co 6801, Co 6807, Co 6904, Co 6907, Co 7110, Co
7201, Co 7202, Co 7203, Co 7205, Co 7206, Co 7207, Co 7214, Co 7218, Co
7225, Co 7308, Co 7407, Co 7430, Co 7432, Co 7534, Co 7701, Co 7802, Co
7902, Co 7910, Co 8006, Co 8016, Co 8019, Co 8025, Co 8101, Co 8118, Co
8121, Co 8139, Co 8145, Co 8210, Co 8224, Co 8225, Co 8301, Co 8331, Co
8345, CoH 5, CoH 15, CoPant 84213, CoPant 84214, POJ 2802 |
|
|
Total |
1860
226 |
|
|
Sugarcane
clones have been evaluated under different stresses to identify elite clones for
tolerance / resistance to such environmental conditions. The selected clones are
presented in the Table below:
|
S.No. |
STRESSES |
RESISTANCE
/ TOLERANCE CLONES |
|
1. |
High
quality during summer |
Co
885, Co 7201, Co 7224, Co 7420, Co 8015, Co 8214, Co 8301, Co 8316, Co
8334 |
|
2. |
Rainfed |
SES-222,
SES-275, SES-352 |
|
3. |
Alkalinity |
CoS
8312, Co 8347, Co 87263 |
|
4. |
Autumn
planting |
Co
7915, Co 88013, Co 89003 |
|
5. |
Salinity |
Co
7717, Co 97016, Co 98016, ISH-009, ISH-028, ISH-034, ISH-135, ISH-148,
ISH-152, ISH-156, ISH-168, ISH-175, ISH-176, ISH-392 |
|
6. |
Water
stress |
Co
6415, Co 6806, Co 7717, Co 7915, Co 85286, Co 87028, Co 87033, Co 89035,
Co 91020, Co 95021, Co 97016, Co 98016, CoLk 8102, CoS 94267, BO 91,
Dhaur Alig, Pararia Shaj., ISH-007, ISH-135, ISH-148, ISH-175, ISH-261,
ISH-273 |
|
7. |
Water
logging |
Co
85286, Co 87033, Co 97014, Co 98016, CoLk 8102, CoS 94267, ISH-007,
ISH-148, ISH-175 |
|
8. |
Red
rot |
IA30-17,
IA31-32, IA31-35, IA33-33, IA33-35, ISH-111, ISH-193, ISH-265, ISH-268,
ISH286, ISH-425, ISH-438, ISH-440, CD-151, CD-366, Co 8347, Co 97017,
CoLk 8102, BO 91, SES-3, SES-4, SES-183, SES-275, SES-594, Baragua |
Ever
since the inception of this Centre, the mandate had been to evolve varieties for
sub‑tropical region of the country. As an out come of such intensive large
scale testing over the years, a large number of Co clones/varieties were
identified at this Centre and occupied a large areas in different regions of
sub-tropical India.
Sugarcane Varietal Scene over the decades in sub-tropical India:
| Pre-twenties | Hemja, Katha, Khakai, Pathri and Saretha |
| Twenties | Co 205, Co 210, Co 213, Co 214, Co 223, Co 281, Co 290 |
| Thirties |
Co 205, Co 213, Co 223, Co 244, Co 281, Co 285, Co 290, Co 312, Co 313 |
| Forties | Co 213, Co 312, Co 313, Co 331, Co 356, Co 453 |
| Fifties | Co 312, Co 313, Co 453, Co 951, CoS 245, CoS 510 |
| Sixties | Co 312, Co 975, Co 1107, Co 1148, BO 17, CoS 510 |
| Seventies | Co 312, Co 1148, Co 1158, BO 17, CoS 510 |
| Eighties | Co 1148, Co 1158, Co 7717, BO 91, BO 99, CoJ 64, CoS 687, CoS 767 |
| Nineties | Co 1148, Co 89003, BO 91, BO 99, CoJ 64, CoJ 81, CoLk 8001, CoPant 84211, CoS 767, CoS 802, CoS 7918 |
CoK
26:
A frost resistant clone was released from this Centre, which was in cultivation
in Eastern UP.
CoK
30:
Red rot resistant clone was released in UP which occupied a considerable area
along with CoS 510 and CoS 527 during 1951 – 60.
CoK
32: (POJ
2878 x Co 331). An early/mid season maturing variety with medium thick canes
well suited to heavy soil conditions. It withstands water logging, tillers
heavily and with high fibre content. It was resistant to top and stem borers and
susceptible to smut. This variety was released in Bihar state and occupied a
fair area in South Bihar and remained in cultivation for 16 years (1943 – 59).
CoK
41:
It was resistant to frost. It was released and was in cultivation in Punjab and
western UP.
Co
312: (Co 213 x Co 244). It was a late maturing variety and did well under
unfavourable conditions. It was in cultivation for more than 4 decades.
Co
975: (Co
527 x Co 617). High
yielding, mid season maturing variety with good ratooning ability. It withstands
drought and water logging. It was resistant to red rot and albino disease. It
was in cultivation in Haryana, Punjab and UP. It is used as a tester variety to
identify race flora of red rot pathogen.
Co
1148: (P4383
x Co 301). It
has medium thick canes with compact growth. This is resistant to frost. It was
in cultivation for more than 3 decades.
Co
62399:
(Co 935 x Co 617). A Karnal selection with moderate yield and good sucrose. It
was moderately resistant to red rot. It was released in UP during 1976 and was
under general cultivation in different zones of the state. It is used as a
parent and tester variety to identify race flora of red rot pathogen.
Co
7314: (Co
1287 self). An early maturing variety was released in Haryana state for
commercial cultivation. It is having medium thick cane and long internodes of
greenish yellow colour. Resistant to top borer, stalk borer and red rot. It has
been utilised in hybridisation programmes for getting red rot resistant
progenies.
Co
7717: (Co 419 x Co 775). A good sugared variety with heavy yield. This
variety recorded 19 % sucrose and 87t/ha yield under Karnal conditions. It was
moderately resistant to red rot, Pyrilla and local borers. It is still under
cultivation in western Haryana.
Co
89003 (Co7314 x Co 775):
Co 89003 an early maturing clones was released for commercial cultivation in
states of Punjab and Haryana. It is resistant to red rot disease. However, it is
susceptible to wilt disease especially when infested with root borer/termites
Co
98014 (Co 8316 x Co 8213) :
Co 98014 an early maturing clone is recommended for cultivation in Punjab state.
This variety showed significant improvement in cane yield over CoJ 64. However,
this variety was on par with CoJ 64 for juice quality traits
Clones under testing:
Co
98014, Co 98015, Co 0116, Co 0117, Co 0118, Co 0120, Co 0237, Co 0238, Co 0239,
Co 0316 early clones and Co 97009, Co 97014, Co 97015, Co 97016, Co 97017, Co
98016, Co 98017, Co 98017, Co 99015, Co 99016, Co 0121, Co 0122, Co 0123, Co
0124, Co 0240, Co 0241, Co 0331 midlate clones are under different stages of
testing in AICRP(S).
Varieties
suitable for ethanol production
Co
7717 gave the best yield of 8050 litres /ha as compared to 6718 litres/ha from
CoJ 64.
Best time of harvest for realizing the maximum ethanol yield/ha was January in
autumn sown crop while it was March in April planted crop.
Co 7717 gave the highest dry bio-mass and energy out put of 165.4 x 10 6 K
Cal/ha. From ethanol 45.3 x 106 K Cal/ha energy out put was obtained.
Varieties
suitable for Jaggery Quality
In
early group, Co 8204 and Co 8209 had better quality than CoJ 64
In mid late and late group, Co 7501, Co 7915, Co 8014, Co 8224 and Co 8347 gave
good quality jaggery and were equal in quality to Co 7717.
Varieties
suitable for high fibre production
Fibre
content more than 13.5 % were found in the following clones:
Co 87263, Co 98014, CoS 767, CoLk 8102
Breeder
Seed Production:
Quality
seed of improved varieties is being produced in 10 acres of land. Indents are
being asked during the month of December each year from sugar mills in Haryana,
Punjab, and Western UP. Sugar mills send their requirements up to 31st
January each year. On the basis of indents received, the seed is
multiplied and supplied to sugar mills and farmers on the recommendation of
sugar mills. During last five years, we have supplied 14,679.33q of quality seed
to sugar mills and farmers in North Western Zone.
Winter
Ratoonability :
Generally high sugared clones are harvested during winter month when temperature is low. Winter ratoonability is of paramount importance to evaluate the newer clone to sustain sugar and cane yield.
Since ratoon is very economical and 5-8 ratoon are taken in foreign countries. It is all the more
necessary to concentrated on winter ratoonability. Once a clone is identified, area under ratoon can be increased, multi ratooning can be recommended.398
clones of different species have been evaluate at Karnal Centre. 15 Clones have
been identified with 100% sprouting. Among the commercial cane BO 91, Co 89029
and Co 91020, Co 90022 recorded equal number
of
sprouting and
tillers when harvested in winter. Growth of both winter and autumn
harvest is almost equal during the month of July.
250
foreign cultivars are under multiplication for systematic evaluation for winter
ratoonability in winter
season.
Cropping
system and row spacing:
Due
to continuous increase in labour shortage and also wages, mechanical harvesting
of sugarcane will become essential in near future. For a mechanical harvester,
the sugarcane has to be planted at a spacing of 150 cm . Keeping this
requirement in view, studies were conducted to find out the most effective
combination of sugarcane and other crops for getting the maximum profit. The
maximum return was obtained by growing onion along with sugarcane.
Ratoon
account for sizeable share in the total production of sugarcane. However,
productivity/ha is low in ratoon crop as compared to the plant crop. Following
operations should be done to get a good yield from sugarcane ratoon crop:
2.
Shaving of stubbles
3. Gap filling
4. Timely application of proper fertilizer.
Water
management:
Studies
on use sodic water for irrigation showed that ridge and furrow planting coupled
with gypsum application (50 % neutralization of sodic water) gave significantly
higher cane yield and better juice quality than conventional planting of
sugarcane without amendment application.
Results
on cane equivalent yields indicated that simultaneous
planting of wheat+ Sugarcane planted in December gave higher value than
sequential plantings in May and total return from simultaneous planting was 24.5
% higher as compared to highest return obtained in conventional planting of
sugarcane after wheat harvest.
Physiology
of Sugarcane Under saline Conditions:
· Sugarcane is moderately resistant to saline conditions. Sett bud germination is most resistant but its following growth is the most sensitive phase in the life of sugarcane plant. Development of two or more fully expanded leaves on a plant makes it resistant to salinity.
·
Sodium
and Cl concentration is minimum in the root tip and keeps on increasing we go up
to about 6 cm and then not much change there after unless some morphological
changes occur in the roots due to aging.
·
Sodium
is far lower than Cl in sugarcane under normal as well as saline conditions. Na
entering the shoot is preferentially retained by the basal stem and Na and Cl
ions are directed towards the older leaves thus keeping the young photosynthetic
tissues relatively free from the toxic build up of these ions mainly responsible
for salinization.
·
Thus
sugarcane plants have been observed to recover (in terms of leaf elongation
rates) from adverse effect of salinity with 2-3 hours of desalinization of the
media. Sugars, accumulated due to
salinity in the growing tissues is utilized in growth within 2-3 hours of
desalinization. Rates of photosynthesis have been observed to start recovering
with in 45 minutes of desalinization. Ionic
factors do not appear to be involved in the young shoot tissues of sugarcane.
Rapid Screening Parameters
For Salt Stress:
Leaf/shoot
elongation rate is the most sensitive non-destructive parameter affected by salinity which may
be used along with rates of accumulation of Na and Cl in the
oldest leaf by 7 days after salinization to screen sugarcane
clones for their relative salt resistance.
Experiments
conducted at the SBI, RC, Karnal using Co-1148 and Co-7717 have shown that
furrow method of planting is helpful in improving germination, growth,
tillering and hence yields of sugarcane as compared to traditional
flat planting method being followed by the farmers of this region.
The effects of furrow method of planting were more spectacular under saline
conditions.
Sett soaking for a day before planting was able to lead to quicker, uniform and improved germination under delayed typical summer planting conditions.
Work
on the Physiology of various sugarcane clones:
Work
is being conducted on the contribution of various physiological characters in
determining the performance of plant crops of 12 sugarcane clones over different
seasons.
· During the crop season 2003-04, CoJ 64 had the minimum leaf length and breadth but next to the minimum of chlorophyll at 105 days after planting (DAP). Chlorophyll content decreased during winter months and was minimum in Co 89003/Co 0120 & maximum in Co 98016.
· With the onset and advance of winter, number of green leaves decreased in all the clones. Number ranged from a minimum of 4 in Co 0120 to a maximum of 10 in CoJ 64 during winter months.
· Rates of photosynthesis in November 2003 ranged from an average of 6.0 in Co 1148 to 10.7mmol m-2 s-1 in Co 0120. Higher rates of photosynthesis of Co 0120 may be one of the factors responsible for its being quite early maturing nature in spite of minimum of leaf area.
· Juice analysis was performed during 3rd week of every month. A comparison of data for 2002-03 and 2003-04 crop seasons for 11 common clones showed that average brix and sucrose % juice were higher by 2.6 % whereas purity was higher by 5 % in October 3rd week during this season over what it was last season. However, the sucrose % in Nov and Dec were higher by 0.9 and 0.6 % and purity by 4.7 and 2.8% respectively over that last season. All the clones except Co 0120 and Co 98016 had higher values for sucrose % juice during Oct 3rd week this season over last season, Co 1148 contributing to a maximum of 4.8% to an over all increase of 2.6%. Cooler nights prior to sampling during Oct 2003 might be responsible for higher sucrose and purity this season than last season. Co 0120 was the best again in October and Co 0119 in Dec in terms of juice quality.
· Foggy weather conditions over a period of a months or so during Dec/Jan 2002-03 and 2003-04 expressed itself in terms of hardly any effect on brix, sucrose and purity % juice values (average of 12 clones) in Dec and Jan. However, brix, sucrose and purity % juice continued to increase in all the clones there after with age and the values were either better or comparable during this season compared to last season. All the midlate or late maturing clones had more sucrose % juice by 1 to 3 units (except for Co 97017 having comparable levels) in March 3rd week this season compared to last season.
·
Sucrose
% in cane, an index of likely recovery, in Co 0120 was way ahead of others
during October 3rd week last season but was even behind CoJ 64 this season.
Co 89003, which was not there in the 12 clones last season was the best in Nov
and Dec during this season and was amongst the top three along with CoJ 64 till
March. Average Sucrose % in cane kept on improving from 6.5 (which was around 5%
during last crop season) in Oct to 9.9 % in March with maximum improvement of
1.3 % between Jan-Feb followed by 1.0% during Oct-Nov. However, the
improvement during last crop season was the maximum between Oct-Nov and was
around 2%.
·
Fungal
diseases
Red rot, Smut, Wilt, Eye spot, Yellow spot, Brown spot, Pine apple, Banded scletioal and Pokkah boeng
·
Bacterial
diseases
Ratoon stunting, Leaf scald and Red stripe.
·
Viral
and mycoplasmal diseases
Mosaic,
Grassy shoot and leaf yellow of sugarcane.
Red rot is
one of the oldest diseases of sugarcane and has been called the “Cancer
“ of sugarcane.
Epidemics of
red rot have occurred as regular event in sugarcane culture in subtropical
India.
* Germplasm / genotypes / clones of sugarcane were evaluated for red rot
resistance.
*Other major thrust has been given on the following aspects of red rot
disease-
*Evaluation of pre and zonal genotypes, inheritance of resistance for red
rot :-
Use of resistance parents in crossing resulted more number of resistant
Seedling.
·
Identification
of physiological races of red rot pathogen-
Six races of red rot pathogen were identified from this zone i.e CF 01 (1148 )CF 02 ( Co7717),CF 03 ( CoJ 64),CF 07(CoJ 64 ),CF 08 ( CoJ84 / CoJ 64 )
and CF 09 (CoS 767 ).
·
Biological
and integrated disease management system
·
Seed
programme for production of healthy disease free seeds ( with the help of
heat therapy )
·
Varietal
balance: A variety should not occupy more than 15 to 25% area.
·
Cropping
system;-Inter
cropping of onion, garlic, linseed with sugarcane helpful to reduce disease
incidence.
·
Crop
rotation:-Crop
rotation with paddy, onion garlic ,linseed and green manure crops helpful to
reduce red rot inoculum.
·
Regular
monitoring and rouging of sugarcane crop ;- Strict
monitoring should be kept on the build up of red rot infection in crop from
April to July. Infected shoots / clumps as and when detected should be rogued
out and 5-10 grams bleaching powder ( contains free chlorine ) should be applied
to each spot followed by covering with soil in order to disinfect the site for
left over inoculum.
·
Field
hygiene;- Sugarcane
stubbles, dry foliage, dead and dry canes should be burnt.
·
Drainage
in field:-Water
logging is known to predispose the plant to red rot infecation. To avoid this
upland fields should be selected as far as possible.
·
Resistance
varieties :- Cultivation
of resistant variety in the easiest way to combat the disease. Some resistant
varieties i.e CoS 8436, Co 89003, Co 98014, Co 98016, Co 0117, Co 0118, Co 0237,
Co 0238, Co 0239, CoH 119, CoPt 94211 and CoS 97264.
Wilt
disease of sugarcane is one of the distructive disease of Sugarcane in Punjab,
Haryana, Utter Pardesh, Bihar , Gujarat, Tamilnadu and Andhra Pradesh.
The
wilt disease adversely affect the
germination. Intensity of infection by
wilt pathogen in seed cane has direct impact on bud germination, root
development tillers and cane formation.
Economic
losses are computed based on quantum of cane dried found at the time of harvest
may vary from 2 to 20 tones per hectare. Mill test showed sugar recovery to be
lower by 9.9 % when the crop
crushed had 6% wilt incidence.
Wilt infection is generally associated wilt root borer infestation.
Sett
treatment with boric acid 0.2% plus Trichoderma
viride and soil application of
neem cake 1.5 – 2.0 Q/ acre along
with earthing up
showed reduction in wilt –root borer infestation.
About 200 species of insects have been reported as damaging sugarcane crop in India. Out of these, about two dozen species of insects are considered as major pests. According to the site and mode of feeding the insect pests of sugarcane can be grouped into the following four categories:
These
pests could be controlled by following measures:
LOCATION
SPECIFIC/ADAPTIVE TRIALS :
Under
the Institute Industry Interface Programme, varietal evaluation trials are being
conducted at sugar factory farms to
identify location specific varieties. Following trials are being conducted at
sugar mills:
(A)
Evaluation and identification of varieties suited to specific locations
of
selected sugar factory areas
(B) Varietal trial for identifying high sucrose cane with disease
resistant.
(C)
Identification of varieties suitable for water logging condition.
(D) Management
of red rot disease.
In
order to study the productivity and profitability under simultaneous planting of
wheat and sugarcane (December
/January) as compared to sequential planting of sugarcane after wheat harvest in
the end of April/ May, a multi location trials were conducted at the following
sugar factory farms
Haryana
: Coop. Sugar Mills, Jind and Coop. Sugar Mills, Meham,
Punjab:
Coop. Sugar Mills,Jagraon,
UP:
Daurala Sugar Works, Meerut and Simbhaoli Sugar Mills,
Distt. Ghaziabad
For
further details, any one can contact the Principal Scientist & Head or any
of the Principal/ Senior Scientists at the following address:
Sugarcane
Breeding Institute, Regional Centre
Agarsein Marg, Opp. PWD colony
Post Box No. 52, Karnal – 132 001
Ph: 0184-2268096
: 0184-2265567 EPBX Extn 1-35
Fax: 0184-2265723
Gram: IKSHU, Karnal
E-mail: bksahi.@Yahoo.co.In.